Are There No Limits to What Americans Will Tolerate?

     I found myself asking this question on a morning last week when the president announced that he was doubling his tariffs (to 50%) on Canadian steel and aluminum, as the markets that Americans hold so precious roiled, and while this unhinged leader, borrowing a line from the Putin rhetorical play-book, vowed to make the “artificial line” between Canada and the U.S. “disappear.”

     I asked myself: how can Americans standby and watch – nay, support – this man systematically trashing decades, or really two centuries of friendship, cooperation, mutual prosperity and support? How can everyday Americans watch dumbly as their leader assaults the best friend they have ever had? Would an invasion that some Canadians are anticipating, (1) an out-and-out attempt at the military takeover of Canada, be the limit? It might be, but I’m not entirely convinced.

     I again asked myself if there is a limit as his minions were abroad, “negotiating” a deal, on behalf of Ukraine, which would require the country to give up territory to a despotic aggressor, and would require them to pay tribute, in the form of minerals, to the U.S. This “deal” can only be described as a shakedown or a protection racket. I continue to ask myself this as the president and his administration attack hard-won minority rights, the free press, and the intellectual freedom of venerable institutions of higher learning. I ask myself as Americans look on as a highly intelligent psychopath is given free reign to tear down administrative institutions and programs that have served the country and the world well for generations. I ask myself as I watch the Environmental Protection Agency and its hard-won improvements and protections are gutted in a single day by its appointed anti-environmental leader.

     Is there a limit to what the American citizenry will tolerate?

     Sorry to say: so far, it appears not.

     Not even the sudden and catastrophic cancellation of over eighty-percent of long-standing beneficial U.S. aid programs has caused much of a stir: nor has the dismantling of the Education Department. It puts me in mind of Germany. As the eminent historian, Richard J. Evans put it: “there were many Germans who were not fanatical Nazis but supported Nazism because it put into practice a sufficient range of their desires and aspirations for them to discount the other aspects.”(2)

     This saddens me deeply. It frightens me, too. And it angers me even more.

     Of course, I realize there is a substantial percentage of people who oppose all this: good people, good Americans, who support what is moral, what is good, what is useful, and what is right. Perhaps they will prevail. But if they are going to do so, they must stand up and be counted soon. There are certainly a number who don’t recognize what the situation is. And it is true that many simply don’t know what to do. This is, after all, an unprecedented situation in the history of the American Democracy.

     The cavalry, in the form of Congress, is not coming to save the day; the slim majorities (that is all it takes) in both the House and the Senate are sycophants of the rogue president and are doing his bidding – the Trumpist poster boy for that being Lindsey Graham, formerly known as The Honourable Lindsey Graham. Nor is it likely that the Supreme Court, having already granted the president broad immunity, will come to the rescue. And so, it appears that it is up to us: We the People.

     There are some positive signs. Good organizations like The American Civil Liberties Union, VoteVets and National Resources Defense Council are standing up, organizing petitions, and suing. Lower courts, at least in part, are acting for what is just. And the people are starting to take to the streets – this latter, as my friend Dr. Dave has commented on previous posts here, looks like what it will take. (3) Perhaps – just perhaps! – we can establish some limits ourselves, and restore decency.

To the Ramparts, then.

 

________________________

1. And the inevitable guerilla warfare that would follow, that some (at least the younger) people are imagining. 

2. Quoted in: Acherson, Neal. “Ordinary Germans.” The New York Review of Books, March 27, 2025, pp. 6 – 10.

3. Last Saturday, our small group of demonstrators on the street corner in the tiny village of Salem, NY, had grown to over 130 people.

I have resisted writing about Trump and Musk and the American coup. I did not want to give the bastards and their toxicity any oxygen. Still, it has been hard to imagine anything else to write about, and so the blog has remained dark.

     I expected it to be bad; and so it has been, only it is much worse. There is no need to list or detail all of that here; we all know what has been happening. He has already declared “LONG LIVE THE KING” (written in all CAPS, of course, as a pathological narcissist would do in referring to himself). (1)  Suffice it to say that the psychopathic team is tearing down the good American government administration, trashing over eighty years of morally excellent humanitarian development, along with unleashing indecent cruelty upon the powerless.

     In this initial period I have been doing the things I can do: signing petitions and sending letters to the powers-that-be. I have been giving small amounts of money to organizations here that are taking the Trump administration to court – apparently our last line of defence, as it seems that Congress is missing in action – such as the American Civil Liberties Union, the Natural Resources Defense Council, 350 Org, and VoteVets. But it feels like not enough. I feel helpless at times.

      Although I am not a Facebook user, a Canadian friend (Richard) sent me a link that I took a look at. It was an Australian, who, in solidarity with Canadians (and Mexicans) is boycotting anything American that he is able to. (His original post was on TikToc.) Good on him, I thought: after all, it is not just Trump alone. As recently as a week ago, the psychopath’s approval rating among Americans was at 53%. (2)  Most often people laud him for “doing what he said he would do” – as though this is a positive, when what the bully is doing is hateful and destructive.

     Unbelievable, incomprehensible: I have lived here half my life and I cannot express my dismay. In any case, the Australian gave me a gift: encouragement, resolve, and a realization. Most inspiring was his declaration, in so many words, that the futility of his effort did not at all negate it. He said, knowing full well that his personal boycott is ineffectual, “I will not be complicit in the tyranny of the U.S.A.” (3)

     I will not be complicit in the tyranny of the U.S.A.

     I have taken this on as a mantra. I refuse to go along. I will not be silent. I will keep sending my bits of money to good organizations. I will keep on signing the petitions, and sending my letters. If I buy anything, if there is a non-American option, I will get that. While cheering on the Canadian hockey players who whipped the U.S. last night, I put a Canadian flag decal on my car. I have my Team Canada hockey sweater ready to wear when I go into town. I will go to the small anti-Trump protest/vigil in the little village of Salem tomorrow and stand in the cold with the rest of the good, decent people. My poster will read: Stop the Coup!

      I do not know what else I will do, but I am determined to think of things. I will keep myself mentally healthy, and as physically healthy as I can be. I will be ready. I will take refuge – as Buddhist adherents take refuge in the Sangha – in the sanctity of my like-minded American friends.

     Eighty years ago, our parents and grandparents defeated the Nazis. We must do the same.

     They will not win without a fight. My answer to them is: no.

     I will not be complicit in the tyranny of the U.S.A.

___________________

1. Yang, Angela. “‘Long live the king: Trump adds monarch rhetoric to actions.” NBC News, 19 Feb. 2025, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/king-trump-rcna192912. Accessed 21 Feb. 2025.

2. Wolf, Zachary B. “Americans voted for Trump. Did they vote for this?” CNN Politics: What Matters, 13 Feb 2025, https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/13/politics/americans-support-for-trump- what-matters/index.html. Accessed 21 Feb. 2025.

3. See: Johnny Cole Public, https://www.facebook.com/reel/2995900423918554. Accessed 21 Feb. 2025. 

The Supreme Court decision, released on July 1, is abundantly clear to all. There is no need for subtle legal analysis. The president of the United States, from this date forward, has immunity from criminal prosecution for any act undertaken while performing so-called “official duties.”

     Any act. Ordering a vice-president not to certify an election, for example. Directing the burglary of the opponent party’s headquarters, for example. Ordering the jailing or assassination of a political opponent, for example. Ordering the U.S. military onto the streets of an American city to end a political protest or otherwise peaceful assembly, for example.

     Richard Nixon’s infamous (and erroneous then) declaration is now the reality in practice: “when the president does it, that means it is not illegal, by definition.”

 

A most basic foundation of democracy is that no person is above the law.

     The country’s founders would be appalled to find that this principle has been scrapped. They deliberately eschewed giving the president sovereign status.

     Six Supreme Court judges have taken the country back to a time predating the start of our common democratic heritage, best symbolized by the declaration of Britain’s Magna Carta.

     It is just possible that the democracy can be saved from the sovereign presidency. It will take a specific amendment to the American constitution.