18 Dead, plus the murderer. 13 Wounded. Weapon: AR 15.

565th mass shooting in the U.S. in 2023.  (Gun Violence Archive.)

Number of non-suicide gun murders to date in the U.S this year? 15,633. (Gun Violence Archive).

     Current State of Affairs:

Permit needed in Maine to carry a gun? Nah.

Assault weapons banned or even limited in that State? Nah.

Public conversation about American gun addiction? Nah.

Conversation about the fact that mass shooting has become a standard, culturally accepted channel to express male grief, despair and fury? Nah.

Hunters and so-called “sportsmen” leading a charge for rational, humane gun control? Nah.

Congress acting to implement basic, reasonable gun control? Nah.

Supreme Court applying twenty-first, rather than eighteenth century, thought and standards to interpret the 2nd Amendment? Nah.

Thoughts and prayers? What, again? I suppose so. What else are we left with?

          Stephen King: We Are Out of Things to Say.

          Nicholas Kristof: A Smarter Way to Reduce Gun Deaths.

 

                                            Well, FIGHT! Fight like hell. IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO LET THIS HAPPEN.     

                                            6 Organizations You Can Support to Promote Gun Control.        

         

          Be happy if there is something to be happy about!
          When the moment comes, do not lose it!
          Though they say life lasts a hundred years,
          Who has seen a full thirty thousand days!
          You are in this world but an instant,
          So don’t sit there grumbling about money.
          At the end of The Classic of Filial Piety
          It tells you all about what funerals are like.(1)

“Be here, now!”

     So Alan Watts charged us.(2) In my twenties, it sounded great. The problem was that I couldn’t do it. I observed that I was mostly running ahead, toward completion, toward the next thing. There was much to do: studying, jobs, money, marriage, a child, where and how to live – “caught between the longing for love and the struggle for the legal tender.”(3) Admittedly, there were times of Flow: becoming lost in a ego-less process, absorbed in the moment, losing track of time itself in the pure pleasure of being.(4) But mostly not: mostly, it was do this or that, and get on to the next thing.

     This goes on for years, with the cares of family and daily life and concerns of career. Then, with retirement, an opportunity opens up. Unless one is planning a new career as a winemaker, tractor-trailer driver, or TikToc fashion influencer, or you fill the void by chauffeuring grandchildren around to Sufi dancing or kettle drum practice, the present opens in a way it has not been open for a long time.

     In this openness there is a natural inclination to review the past and to assess how one has done.(5) You have run your career race and came in seventh. This can be okay and work out well enough, depending on attitude: “I was married more times than a radio talk-show host, but I never lost hope.” Or, “I didn’t end up writing The Great Novel, but that chapbook of racy limericks was a killer!”

     In my work, I made the world a better place.

     Or this can turn to rumination and recrimination, which is never a good thing for the emotions or disposition. My ship came in, but I failed to get on board. It can be depressing, because we all fail spectacularly, and at this point there is nothing you can do about it. But the latter is also the good news. There most definitely is nothing you can do about it, so you might as well give up on it and make a nice fried egg and tomato sandwich.

     Your thoughts also go forward toward The End Game, as a ninety-two-year-old friend calls it. Somewhere along the line, starting in late middle age, our mental calculation changes from time spent on the planet to time left. In older age, this is acute. There is no room for denial: time is limited and the outcome is fixed. It is just a matter of when and how.

     How this goes is naturally affected by one’s state of health. Even without major problems, aging issues can be vexing. Brown things and skin tags start growing on you like you are a compost pile. Your arm hurts for no reason. Legs get stiff and athletic activities like tying your shoelaces make you short of breath. Or like me, a hand starts to shake one day and doesn’t stop: “essential tremor,” Dr. Google calls it, which means they have no idea where it comes from and there is nothing that can be done about it. Why it is “essential” beats me. My fine doctor offered me neurological testing, which I appreciated, but declined. Why bother if there is no fix?

     After seventy, one can become afraid to go to the doctor for fear of discovering something that will kill you sooner or later, but of which, until that appointment, you were happily ignorant. That has been the case with me. I go to the doctor with no complaint and pow! Now I have a problem. That is one reason that the annual physical is terrifying. Adding to the horror, if you are of a certain age, they start asking you to remember three words and recall them later, or ask you to draw a picture of a clock showing twenty to ten. (My advice on this? Refuse. Don’t do it – don’t go down without a fight!) All this naturally leads one to think that the obvious solution is not to go to the doctor at all, which was the recommendation of a friend’s mother. She lived to 91 and died happy. However, such a course can lead to a surprise heart attack while imagining Shania Twain without any clothes on when you are country line dancing at the Senior Centre, or keeling over with a stroke while serving figgy pudding to that felonious band of in-laws at Christmas dinner. So not having checkups is not most advisable.

     Entirely too many people in retirement age are troubled, if not tormented, by illness and debilitation, and I am sorry for them. I do not yet have this. I only have to know where the washrooms will be if I go for an urban walk. I count myself very lucky. I feel much compassion for those who are afflicted, who feel so poorly and who are stuck in endless rounds of appointments, tests, and treatments, and those as well who suffer pain and impairment. I have friends among them and have lost friends to the diseases they have encountered. It is something that the Buddhists warn us about, and they suggest that we prepare; but still, it does not feel quite fair. You put in a lifetime of effort and good work, kindness and caring, and it comes to debilitation and discomfort. Then you die. Jarring, that.

     So you have to face your mortality: The End Game. Retiring does both make it plain that you have been to the mountaintop and now are on the downslope, and it gives you more time to think about it. This might be alright, a sort of preparation for death as Freud proposed.(6) For some it might bring relief; you will miss things, of course, like how the kids are doing or the laughter or your mate; but on the other hand, you will be free of pain if you have that, and certainly you will not have to hear or read about Taylor Swift ever again – no small compensation, that.

     Still, death can be a ruminative burden and for some is frightening, although not inevitably so. Many are consoled by religion, and look forward to an afterlife. Others – those of us without a strict belief in the continuation of a human soul – are without this solace, yet we are still not afraid. After all, if we come from the cosmic ether, we will go back to it; there is not much frightening about that. Although to be sure there can be anticipatory grief – about one’s pending absence from the dance.

     So with the past done, and a future that is dodgy, what we are left with is the present moment – just as good old Watts prescribed. And as Freud implied, and the Buddhists advise, contemplation of mortality provides a focus, an opportunity to experience the present to its fullest, in a way we never have before.

     Friends and companions help a great deal on this journey. The old gang at the office or the plant have gone on ahead without us. What we are left with is a partner, if we have one, and our old friends. The old reliable, more-or-less daily, enforced socializing of the workplace has vanished, and for many a void is opens up.

     Much is made of the value of socializing in general, especially in popular psychology and the New York Times. This notion is a regular feature and sells a good number of issues of Psychology Today. But the idea appears to be overrated and there is not much real social science behind this.(7) As a confirmed and contented Introvert, I am skeptical about the value of casual socializing. I can take it or leave it, mostly the latter. And I don’t think I am alone in this: ask the third of the North American population who share my temperamental trait.

     That said, complete isolation is bad for one, and correlates with higher rates of depression, heart attack, early death and inebriated purchasing of workout equipment from infomercials at three in the morning. So for goodness sake, despite the reservation expressed above, if you are isolated and lonely, by all means do join that backgammon club, church choir, or a weekly book club, or if desperate and in danger of developing suicidal ideation, take up pickleball. Make a friend!

 

I am sitting on an August Sunday early afternoon, eating a store-bought turkey sandwich with a good old friend at the picnic table at the Stewart’s store in the quaint village that he grew up in. He is an empathetic fellow who sat with me one time many years ago in another Stewart’s, and listened when I was at a very low point in my life. A couple of times a month I receive a brilliant multi-page longhand letter from him, describing the subtleties of everyday life, his reading regimen, and intellectual explorations. He is a member of a select class of people: highly intelligent, yes, but more, a true scholar. I count myself fortunate to know not just one, but two people like this, who, no matter what they are doing as a livelihood at a particular time, read and learn and think for its own sake. Once I called up the other of them, M.W., when he was in Brooklyn visiting his daughter and I asked him what he was planning to do that evening. “I’m going back to the hotel to think,” he replied.

     K.B. takes me on a walking tour around the village, with tales of adventures at the old school, early and later grades, middle-school exploits, and unrequited teenage love. We wander by the now-dilapidated band shell where his high-school rock and roll band debuted. As we walk away from the now sad and decrepit little public park, I am carrying on about my current side-by-side re-reading of Jack Kérouac’s The Subterraneans vs. Leonard Cohen’s Beautiful Losers, and why the former is a success, while the latter is a failure, in my opinion. I declare that it is because Kerouac’s telling is full of emotion and a visceral love of life, while Cohen’s lacks these and is rather cold. I find I have no empathy for its characters: surprising in a work by the writer of So Long Marianne and Dance Me to the End of Love. K.B does not interrupt my opining and instead listens attentively, which I appreciate. Is it not true that we all want to be heard?

     After the walkabout, we talk about his upcoming project of reading the eight hundred pages of L’Être et le Néant : Essai d’Ontologie Phénoménologique that he had ordered – half-jokingly he proposes to read two or three pages at a time, in the booths at each one of the 350 plus Stewart’s stores in New York and the few in Vermont. I think this is an outstanding idea. He jokes again and wonders how it might stack up against the wanderings of Herodotus.(8) We consider what kind of car would be appropriate for such an epic journey. K. B.’s 2018 Honda does not seen quite right for the odyssey – a more classical ride would seem appropriate. I suspect my friend leans toward something like his previously-owned late-sixties Dodge Charger, but I am envisioning something more modest, such as a Morris Minor Traveller station wagon from 1957, preferably in the classic British racing green. Of course, I am thinking that offsetting the carbon would have to be considered, which is difficult these days as it has come to light that most of the available offset schemes are fraudulent.

     Before we part, we wonder out loud if there is a market for a basic car without all the annoying features like fobs, lane correction, touch screens and heated seats. Something with key-entry, roll-down windows, no-draft vents, and a standard transmission would be nice. I am imagining a two-door Valiant with a Slant Six under the hood, not with that push-button automatic, maybe a sixty-one with the classic fins. A perfect car: would there not be buyers for such a thing in 2023, I ask? We muse that one would think so, but probably not. To be sure, for my part, this – old cars were better etc. – is retired geezer jawing at its very best. Very satisfying. I am sorry to take leave of my friend.

     Now I am back in the afternoon sun, in the yard, sitting in a weather-worn wooden Adirondack chair. I am the lazy one; I am reading and smoking a cigar while my mate labours in the garden. I see a bee – not my bee from July, the one that came to the window during news time, but another one and I wonder where my bee went. I hope it wasn’t eaten. A big Monarch butterfly comes by and flutters around me, darting here and there, up and down, back and forth. Then, apparently not bothered by the the cigar smoke, it alights on my knee and there it perches.

     I am one lucky bastard. This Monarch thinks I am trustworthy enough to rest awhile on my blue jeans. I live on an acre of rural paradise. My modest income is sufficient for my needs: there is nothing more I want to own and nowhere I want to travel. My health ain’t perfect, but it ain’t bad, either. I have some friends. My wife, K., loves me unconditionally, and when I grumble about one or another of my shortcomings, tells me that I am perfect just as I am. I am inclined to disagree with this assessment, but I do not debate the point; in any case, I feel the same about her, so have no basis to argue. The sun is on my face, the book is excellent, and our friendly dog-like cat is lying by the raised garden. My daughter, off in Toronto, is thriving, and my smart and good-natured grandchildren are launching into the world. None of this is permanent, of course; any of it could change in an instant.

     But in this moment, I am grateful. I am retired and have nothing to do.

     I have only to be here, now.

__________________________________

1. Hanshan. Cold Mountain: 100 Poems by the Tang Poet Han-Shan. Translated by Burton Watson. Columbia University Press, 1970. Accurate details have been lost in time and myth, but the Buddhist recluse is thought to have lived around the seventh or eighth century. 

2. Columbus, Peter J., and Donadrian L. Rice. Alan Watts – Here and Now: Contributions to Psychology, Philosophy, and Religion. State University of New York Press, 2012.

3. Browne, Jackson. The Pretender. Flat Town Music Co., 1976.

4. Csíkszentmihályi, Mihály Róbert. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row, 1990.

5. Erikson, Erik, with Joan Erikson. Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton & Co., 1959.

6. Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Translated by C. J. M. Huback. Digireads Publishing, 2020. First published 1920.

7. La Grassa, Jennifer. Do Exercise, Nature and Socializing Make People Happier? Research Suggests We don’t Really Know. CBC News, August 26, 2023.

8. Kapuściński, Ryszard. Travels with Herodotus. Translated by Klara Glowczewska. Vintage, 2008.

 

 

For the last part of June and most of July, every day a big bumblebee arrived at the livingroom window and buzzed around for a while – not bumping into the glass like the foolish houseflies, but just checking it out, floating. I thought of Muhammad Ali. “Float like a butterfly” – and do what a bee does. The big window is my favourite in the house, a place to daydream now that I am retired, overlooking, as it does, the lush yard, the swamp beyond, and further beyond that the Green Mountains of Vermont. The bee arrived each day as K. and I watched world tragedies without end unfold in vivid colour on the BBC news.

I know it was the same guy. Scoff not: I recognized him. Like all sentient beings, bees live according to their biological patterns of course, but at the same time, they are individuals like our cats, our dogs, our chickens, and ourselves.

In any case, I have seen this on PBS, in a documentary by Martin Dorn, who stayed home during the pandemic and studied and filmed the bees in his garden for a year. (1) He showed that they have habits, traits – you could even say personalities – and that they keep individual travel and visitation schedules, according to whatever whims are driving them, beyond their biological predispositions and imperatives. This strikes me as a good way to live: to follow a schedule that comes not from without, but within. Just like me, now. After seventy years, I have a personal schedule that is free of the relentless overlay of outside demands.

It begins with grade one at King George school. Six-and-a-half-years-old, I have lucked out and missed the calamity of kindergarten, newly introduced in Northern Ontario. Still, there I am: having been free and wild on the streets and alleys of our small town, I now find myself expected to go to the same place every day, to the same dull room, to sit unmoving in the same confining desk under the hostile eyes of the sadistic Miss Scott.

Miss Scott: she is the first among a number of bad bosses. In the first few days of class, she has us come up to her desk one at a time and sing Oh Susanna or such, a cappella, standing in front of her: excruciating enough. Then, based on what she hears, she divides us into Canaries, Robins, and Crows. I am a Robin. The poor Crows probably never sang again, not even in the shower. What sort of person does that to children?

Years later I mentioned her to a cousin who is ten years older than I am, but who also had Miss Scott. He flew into a tirade, sputtering and cursing. He had never forgotten her either.

Seventy-five percent of Americans name a bad boss as the number one stressor in the workplace. (2) But despite Miss Scott, and later Kenny and Frank, I don’t really think it was only bad bosses that made me not want to get up and go to work – but they coloured that world, to be sure.

Kenny and Frank are drill operators and hence my bosses when I work as a helper during summers as a university student. Kenny has spent thirteen years in the Kingston Pen for manslaughter after jamming a broken beer bottle into the forehead of a barroom opponent. He is okay most of the time, but you don’t want to rile him, if you follow me. A year after I work with him, I hear that his clothing gets caught and he is dragged into the business end of a big auger machine, breaking every bone that could be broken in a human being, before the helper could turn the machine off. I don’t hear how he fared after that.

Frank, on the other hand, has not been to jail, but is a wife-beater and drinks twenty beers a day. He can single-handedly pick up the two-hundred-and-fifty pound drop-hammer and place it on the equipment trailer – not that much if you consider the world dead-lift record, but still. At one point he rushes at me with fists clenched vowing to kill me after I drop a drill rod down a three-hundred-foot borehole. Terrifying to have that raging hulk come at you: I can still feel the adrenaline. He only stops when I threaten him with the thirty-six inch pipe-wrench, which I cock like a baseball bat. He comes to his senses and just curses me out; a good thing, as the pipe-wrench would not have been enough to stop him. No doubt these guys contributed to my having a bad – or at least a sceptical, you might say – attitude early on toward the supposed pleasures and benefits of the workplace.

Fortunately the work and the bosses got better after this, and once I became a boss myself, I improved a lot on my first role models: low bar, I know. Lest I create a completely negative impression here, I must say that management and working conditions improved dramatically over the years. I worked for terrific people and excellent organisations. 

Early bad bosses aside and given great improvements in the nature of the work that followed, it remains something of a mystery that I don’t remember ever really wanting to go in to a place of employment. I preferred to stay home and do things I wanted to do, by myself, probably with a coffee pot and the radio playing in the background. I suspect this feeling is common enough. It is true that you hear of people describing how they can not wait to get to the office in the morning, to accomplish this and that, and see the gang, etc. However, the reluctance of Covid-era remote workers to return to the office surely indicates something different for many of us.

I have thought that perhaps I am just lazy, but that seems unlikely. I have degrees aplenty, which certainly required work, and I did accomplish things in years of community mental health work and in teaching that I am most contented to remember. I know that in my way I made the world a better place. And I was a decent boss. Yet, the mental health work was trying; it wore me out. At the time I was studying Zen Buddhism and so I tried to emulate the scholar warriors (3) and to take heart from the teaching of the bodhisattvas: “Remedy suffering wherever it is, whatever form it takes and whoever causes it.” (4) This helped me, and then the years of teaching were easier. I experienced failure of course, but overall, I found success at both. And so now I retire happy, perhaps with some not-unusual regrets over missed opportunities or paths not taken, but with the knowledge that I did my best.

Not wanting to go into work might simply have been a result of my introversion. In any case, I can say I don’t miss it. I’m happy to stay home, and like the bee, figure out each day what I want to do. I have no empty feeling, no existential panic in face of blank canvases of days.

Nor does it bother me that I have no role and no status. I had a foretaste of this. In 2010, after some trials in my personal life, I decided to change how I was living. I wanted to stay home, to live more creatively, to write some and take a few pictures – and to move back to Canada. With few prospects, and no money to speak of, I resigned my tenured professorship. I recall the feeling, after I moved, of sitting on a park bench in Toronto on a cold November day, the wind whipping in from Lake Ontario, known to no one around me, with no persona, no role, no position – just another bozo on a bench, with no place to go and nothing to do. It was absolutely exhilarating.

Of course, I had to eat and pay the rent, so I built a late-season career as an online adjunct professor, with a couple of courses at my old college and some from other institutions. “Full-time work for one-third the pay,” an ex-colleague joked. True enough, but I loved it. I woke on my own time and read awhile with coffee and classical music on the radio. Sometimes I would go out on the balcony of my high-rise apartment and watch the homo sapiens racing to work on foot, in cars, on the busses and streetcars. I watched with satisfaction – not with schadenfreude, although there was something comical to all the intense hotfooting around, something that I can’t quite name. Mainly I felt empathy for these people along with immense gratitude that I no longer had to do this. After all the decades, I finally got to stay home.

I still had demands: course sites to build, clever assignments to create, tests to post, emails to answer, and useful feedback to give on submissions. Enjoyable enough tasks, but now I am glad to be without them. I am relieved not to wake up each Tuesday morning and to log on to sixty or a hundred essay assignments waiting in the mailbox, all begging timely review and grading. I liked my work very much, and especially liked working on my own, but I’d had enough. A clear example of Cameron’s Second Law: Good things go on too long.

By the way, it says something about human nature that although students had a full week to submit assignments, almost all of them came in about a half-hour before the time limit. Also, despite there being 167 other hours to take an online test, most were completed in the hour before the deadline.

In any case, in online teaching, I had gone as far as I could go. As a professor – never mind the formal “course assessments” that have been foisted off on teachers – when the semester ends, every educator worth his or her salt thinks “how could I do better?” After my last semester, this spring, my answer was: nothing. I could do no better. Time to go, then.

Although it is not the case so far, I expect I will miss the students more than some other things. You won’t hear me complaining about younger people. Some, of course, were happily illiterate or worse: resentful participants, just putting in time. But most wanted to accomplish something, wanted to learn, wanted to make something of themselves. And they cared about this world, about climate broiling, about racism and sexism and institutionalized inequity, and most wanted no part of these and other injustices. They helped me to feel optimism, to believe there was some hope for the human race.

Optimism is important when you have retired and are getting older, when your bones ache inexplicably and these warty things start growing on your bulgy, once-svelte body, and all the musicians and singers and great people who populated your world start dropping dead – and as well, you have all the time you could want to ruminate about the television news.

It must be said: it is critical not to end up being that old codger in his nasty recliner, Keystone beer can in hand, sitting in the corner of the room jawing at loved ones about the deplorable condition of the world and the decline of civilization as we know it. These things are true of course: the world is in deplorable condition, and civilization is in decline, but that is no excuse to sit around and allow yourself to develop OBD – Old Bastard Disorder. OBD, by the way, is not gender-typed; you may be a man or a woman, or in keeping with fashionable ideology, anything in between or outside of those categories, and still succumb to OBD.

No, you have to stay optimistic and carry on, even while, for example, a dreadful little psychopath slaughters the good people of Ukraine, or given climate change, when it looks like your grandchildren will live on a planet much like the one in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road – or while the whole country of Canada is on fire (and, to boot, firefighters say that people are stealing their equipment when they are not looking, as CBC reported about the Kelowna fire).

And the whiners: oh my God, the whiners! These people complain when the cell signal is poor – meanwhile, I remember that my parents, for decades after the Great Depression, saved string out of fear of not having any in the future. It is hard to think that civilization has not gone down the pipe when a Yellowknife story described people complaining about the (successful) evacuations. Days before the fire reached the town (the fire never made it, in fact, due to the diligence of the firefighters), 95% of the population had been evacuated hundreds of miles by air, or guided down the one two-lane highway, with the government providing free gas from tankers along the way – brilliant! Yet the paper quoted a person complaining that the government had acted too slowly, that the evacuation should have been done sooner, even though the fire had not reached the city. In the preceding days, she could smell the smoke in her office even with the “HEPA” filters going full blast, and it was “uncomfortable,” she reported, with a straight face. Perhaps she also was put off that the civil servants did not offer fresh trays of sushi and avocado-on-toast as well, along NWT Route 3 as she headed south. Another evacuee, safely ensconced at a paid-for motel hundreds of miles south of the fire, complained that there was “nothing to do.” One wonders why the news providers give these people any air time, but that is another problem, I suppose.

So, yes, it is hard to stay optimistic knowing these knuckleheads are out there, and I am not even talking about the Marjorie Taylor Greenes of the world – this one, an actual American Congressional Representative elected by real citizens eligible to vote, who believes the California fires were caused by Jews firing lasers from outer space. On purpose. No, I say I won’t even talk about these people.

But enough! Remember: OBD. In retirement, with time and space to think, you have to navigate this and other similar things. One immediate solution is to limit how much you watch the news, which is what K. and I have done: hence, the half-hour of BBC with the visiting bee.

As for the rest – what to do with your freedom from schedules, tasks and bosses? If your health is decent (that’s another story: more later), it isn’t that hard. Take a walk down the dirt road and check out the wild turkeys. Plunk yourself in the yard and read The Consolations of Philosophy that has been gathering household fallout on your bookshelf. Like K., get out the watercolour kit and paint a picture. Play your vinyl version of Sticky Fingers, or stream the Queen’s Own Highlanders piping The March of the Cameron Men on your phone, if you really must. Grow some tomatoes or sunflowers. Dust off the disused Yamaha and play My Wild Irish Rose. Write a mystery, however crappy, or a letter to the editor. Volunteer, if you are up to it, to take a person even older than yourself to a doctor’s appointment. Send a few bucks to the local fire company or the U.N. Refugee fund. Meditate and find compassion in your heart for the Miss Scotts and the Kennys and Franks of the world, for surely they must have suffered, as did their victims. Sit on a rainy September day, when the leaves are just beginning to change from green to yellow, and stare out the window. Step outside into the air and sniff it. For God’s sake, avoid OBD, although I think it is good to stay a tad crusty. Probably the best advice I’ve ever read that applies to retirement is to “chop wood, carry water.” (5)

But I take inspiration from my visitor: the free, black and orange insect who, for a while, came by regularly during news time, and reminded me of the inimitable Muhammad Ali and his counsel. “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.” Right. Got it.

     Next: On Retirement, Part II: The End Game.

1. Dorhn, Martin. My Garden of a Thousand Bees. Passion Planet, 2023.

2. Abbajay, Mary. What to Do When You Have a Bad Boss. Harvard Business Review, September 7, 2018.

3. Deng, Ming-Dao. Scholar Warrior: An Introduction to the Tao in Everyday life. HarperCollins Publisher, 1990.

4. Marchese, David. Talk (Matthieu Ricard). New York Times Magazine, August 20, 2023.

5. Fields, Rick. Chop Wood, Carry Water: A Guide to Finding Spiritual Fulfillment in Everyday Life. Penguin Publishing Group, 1984.

 

      A CBC online news feed article (in the “Science” section, no less) entitled Why Air Conditioners Can Be a Problematic Solution to Extreme Heat (1) reported the startling news from Statistics Canada that household air conditioning can be one of the “most effective adaptation strategies to reduce heat-related mortality and morbidity,” but that – surprise, surprise – this is not sustainable because air conditioning use contributes to global heating!

     Well, blow me down!! Who could have seen that coming??

     In a perhaps related article, the news feed reported the story – one that probably should be filed under the category of We Are All Doomed – of a father and son who drove all the way from Virginia to Niagara Falls, Ontario, in their vintage army jeep, in order to buy forty bags of Lay’s Ketchup Chips, which they love and are not available in the U.S.A. Depending on how you go, and your starting point in Virginia, that is about 530 – 690 miles (853 – 1111 kilometers). Let’s choose a mid-number, say 600 miles, and very generously allow the aforementioned vintage army jeep twenty miles per American gallon. That’s sixty gallons, round trip.

At twenty pounds per gallon, that is 1200 pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere, in order to obtain these ketchup chips.

Naturally, I hate to be critical — but better get an air conditioner, it is gonna get hot. The chips are probably bad for their health, too. Anyway, I prefer the salt and vinegar variety.

(1) Chung, Emily. Why Air Conditioners Can Be a Problematic Solution to Extreme Heat. CBC News. July 24, 2023. https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/air-conditioners-sustainability-heat-1.6914054

(2) Hristova, Bobby. Father and Son Drive for 2 Days from Virginia to Niagara Falls to Load Up on Ketchup Chips. CBC News. July 24, 2023. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/father-son-road-trip-ketchup-chips-1.6913941

 

(This is an updated and expanded version of the letter printed in the Granville Sentinel, May 25, 2023. Given that this is a U.S. piece, partially published, I have eschewed my usual practice of using Canadian spellings.)

Dear Editor:

I read in the May 11 Granville Sentinel that Matt Simpson, the State Assemblyman for our District (114), applauds New York’s “updated language” that permits concealed-carry in the Adirondack Park and other State lands. I also read in the Albany Times-Union that he supports a proposed “stand-your-ground” law for the State. Ironically, the Sentinel article appeared alongside an update on the bail appeal of Kevin Monahan, who senselessly shot and killed young Kaylin Gillis in rural Hebron, New York, where I live. With all due respect to the Assemblyman, the last thing we need is wider concealed-carry, or any carry for that matter, and we certainly do not need a stand-your-ground law. New York’s “Castle Doctrine” and other standards already provide for reasonable self-defense.

Let me qualify: I grew up in a small town surrounded by wilderness, where hunting and long-gun ownership was taken for granted. I hunted when I was young. I am not against reasonable gun ownership per se, and I am certainly not against hunting. What I am against is the killing of young children in their classrooms. I am against someone using an assault rifle to murder ten people and wound three more at a Buffalo supermarket. I am against shooting a young man who mistakenly rings your doorbell, and against shooting two cheerleaders who get into the wrong car. I am against my neighbor taking pot shots at a group of retreating young people – killing one of them – who mistakenly had entered the wrong driveway.

More and more guns in more and more places do not make Americans safer and safer. If that were true, the U.S. would be the safest place in the world. But it is the opposite: compared to similar Western democracies like Canada, Britain, and Germany etc., the per capita rates of murder and gun violence are off-the-scale. Here, there are simply too many guns, too many handguns, too many military-grade guns, too many places we can carry them, and we are too free and too quick to use them. The result is a horrifying number gun-related deaths. As of May 8, 2023, there already had been 202 mass shootings in the United States for the year – nearly two per day. And as repugnant as it is startling, gun violence is now the leading cause of death for children – excluding infants – in this country. If this does not make one want to stop and reconsider what we are doing, how we are living, what would?

It seems obvious, but apparently must be said, since people do not appear to understand: States with more restrictive gun safety laws like California and New York have significantly lower rates of gun violence than states with weak or permissive laws, like Texas and Florida (Everytown Research). (1) These facts do not lie.

Further, stand-your-ground laws only make people trigger-happy, so that, for example, a movie theater argument and thrown popcorn result in a pulled gun and a death – and the killer walks, as happened in Florida. Multiple studies, including by the Rand Corporation, have found that homicide numbers go up, not down, after states enact stand-your-ground laws. (2)

I don’t pretend to know all the solutions to American gun mayhem, but a few things are obvious as a start: sensible gun control (that the majority of Americans support), limiting the public carrying of guns, concealed or otherwise, and reasonable self-defense standards (that we already have in New York State and in Canada) as opposed to stand-your-ground laws.

Enacting gun control legislation is, I admit, notoriously difficult given the funding of the gun-toting diehards, the recalcitrant Republican opposition, and a Supreme Court that has been acting rather unwisely in its recent interpretations. But there are practical ways to start, as Nicholas Kristof has so well outlined in his New York Times editorial. (3) He advocates an incremental harm-reduction approach, including stronger background checks, moderate limits on the types of weapons (automatic) that can be bought, and so on – regulatory efforts that are similar to those that have been used with success in reducing smoking deaths and making driving safer.

Of course, regulatory efforts run into the problem of that devilishly-phrased Second Amendment to the Constitution. Something from another time, an old notion written with confusing grammar: debating its true meaning stands between us and sanity. I will skip that. A constitution should serve a people, not people serve a constitution. And enlightened social policy should not be determined by consulting the likes of militant second-amendment supporters such as The Proud Boys, Ammon Bundy of Idaho, or Greg Abbot of Texas.

Start the struggle to change the damn thing! Amend it, or repeal it. Naïve, you say? Perhaps, but what is the alternative? 125 +/- gun deaths per day as it is now? 150? 250? 500? What is the number, exactly, that will inspire us to action? Amendments can be, and have been, changed or repealed (at least the misguided 18th).

Yet we must go further; it is not just the second amendment and laws that are the problem. It is the culture itself: a propensity for violence coupled with the “gun culture.” Over time. the belief in owning, carrying and using guns has become a American fetish, a form of cultural neurosis, complete with puerile notions of manliness and immature patriotism. One writer (Ed Pilkington) has called it a fatal attraction – a “fatal gun attraction,” that is. (4) He is correct. It is time for  a program of cultural psychotherapy with the goal of putting guns back in their place as hunting weapons, not as something symbolizing freedom or manhood, not something to brandish, not something to carry around in public places, not something used to menace your neighbors, and certainly not something used to settle disputes – or for that matter, to be used as weapons of despair by alienated people, slaughtering innumerable others as they commit public suicide.

Which brings up the issue of mental health: services for the mentally ill have been touted as a solution. They are not. The United States does not have higher rates of mental illness than comparable countries. In addition it is a fallacy to say that the mentally ill have higher rates of murder and gun violence than the so-called “normal” population. They don’t. So one can’t say that mental illness is the problem. Proposals to fix gun violence with more mental health services are nothing but misdirection: a way to avoid facing the problem.

Addressing all of this, and the gun fetish particularly, will require a considerable cultural self-examination and public conversation. It is not impossible to do this, even with the likes of Fox News and Twitter as obstructionist forces. It has happened before: after World War Two, the populace, in public discourse, attempted to figure out what to do about mental illness and the practice of psychiatry. That conversation culminated in the establishment of the National Institute of Mental Health and later the very successful Community Mental Health Act, signed by President Kennedy in 1963. We can do this again with guns. Nothing less is required as part of the solution to the calamitous public health gun crisis that we are experiencing.

An Albany Times-Union article on May 14 discussed the intention of some Capital Region schools to restrict student smart-phone usage during school hours. Prominent among student concerns was they would be without their phones in a school shooting situation.

It shames us all to read this. It makes one ask: how could we allow things to get to this?

What sort of people are we? This last question, really, is the one we have to answer.

Yours sincerely,

Peter S. Cameron
____________________

1. Gun Safety Laws Save Lives. Everytown Research, 2023. https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/

2. Effects of Stand-your-Ground Laws on Violent Crime. Rand Corporation, January 10, 2023. https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/stand-your-ground/violent-crime.html

3. Kristof, N. A Smarter Way to Reduce Gun Deaths. New York Times, April 11, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/24/opinion/gun-death-health.html

4. Pilkington, E. How America’s Fatal Gun Attraction Turned Schools into War Zones. The Guardian, May 12, 2023.  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/13/mass-shootings-schools-guns-violence

The Guardian reports that American CEO compensation has risen to 351 times the pay for workers in recent decades. Said compensation has gone up by 1,322% since 1978. One-thousand, three-hundred and twenty-two percent, that is. i

     The rise in worker’s pay for the same period: 18.9%.

     CEO compensation has even outdistanced the rest of the top 0.1% by six times (note: not the “One Percent,” that we talk about, but rather the point one percent).

     At the same time, right now CEO’s and other pundits are decrying the so-called “labour shortage,” and are blaming the Covid-related unemployment benefits for people not returning to work. Although all labour is of course honourable, it could be that in addition to benefits, the pandemic has resulted in people reconsidering their crap jobs and despotic bosses, the same jobs that pay starvation wages, and so they are understandably resisting the return.

     The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour, which translates to a whopping $290 a week before taxes. Good luck trying to live on $290 a week in the U.S. in 2021. It is a little-recognized fact, obscured by right-wing ideology and propaganda, that the majority of officially poor households in North America have at least one member working full-time, full-year.ii

     Another fact: had the minimum wage kept pace with inflation and worker productivity since the late seventies, we would have a $24 per hour minimum wage, rather than fighting over a paltry $15/hour. It would not be hard to get to $24/hour – just take it out of the CEO compensation, and also have us, the consumers, pay what – a dollar more? – for our poison-burgers and side of death-fries at McDonald’s.

     There is an upside. As compensation for this ongoing trickle-up (or torrent?) of wealth from the lower to the highest economic classes, we can at least be entertained by watching billionaires using the fruit of their workers’ labour to race into space in their phallus-shaped rockets.

iOliver, Indigo. “American CEOs Make 351 Times More than Workers. In 1965 It was 15 to One.” The Guardian, August 22, 2021.

iiCarl, John D., and Marc Bélanger. Think Sociology. 2nd Canadian ed., Pearson, 2015.

 

One in five Americans think that the Covid-19 vaccinations carry a chip used by the government for tracking purposes.

At the same time, 70% of Americans believe they have become smarter during the pandemic.

_____________________

Sources:

The Economist/YouGov Poll, July 10 – 13, 2021. Representative sample (stratified by gender, age, race, education and region) drawn from the 2018 American Community Study. Retrieved from: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/w2zmwpzsq0/econTabReport.pdf.

Harper’s Index.” Harper’s. Vol. 343, No. 2055, August, 2021.

Republican-led States Move to Limit Public Health Measures in the Name of Freedom!

At least nine Republican-governed states in the U.S. have passed laws, or are in the process of passing laws, that limit the ability of public health departments to impose measures to limit the spread of contagious diseases like Covid-19 in health emergencies, such as a pandemic. Currently, six other Republican states are considering such limitations.

It appears that they are taking the motto on New Hampshire’s licence plates – Live Free or Die – quite literally.

No state governed by the Democratic Party is imposing or considering such laws. If you are planning to move, this could be used as a handy way to discern which state to consider moving to, depending on which side of the continuum you come down on: Live free and die from Coronavirus and other epidemics, vs. Temporarily give up a little freedom for the good of the community and to live another day.

Montana has barred quarantines by local health authorities for anyone “exposed to or infected by a contagious disease.” Thus, an extremely effective public health practice used since plague times, specifically the “Black Death” of the fourteenth century, is now illegal. Remind me not to visit Montana again.

North Dakota has banned health authorities from “requiring a face covering for any reason.” Remind me…oh, yea, said that already.

Florida has given the governor the power invalidate any local health emergency order. That means the person who can decide what is in the public interest in the case of a major outbreak or other public health emergency, is, ah…Ron DeSantis. Uh, oh.

Perhaps, though, we should not be concerned about this; after all, this could be a textbook example of Darwinian selection at work. But no, please allow me to take that back: that notion is without human compassion, especially for all the poorer or disenfranchised people in those states who lack the resources to protect themselves.

Please! Remind me!

Source: Glenza, Jessica. “Republicans Bid to Limit Health Officials Could Cause ‘Preventable Tragedies’ – Experts.” The Guardian, July 23, 2021.

The Great Barrier Reef

The UNESCO World Heritage Committee has agreed to delay placing the Great Barrier Reef on its list of “in danger” sites after heavy lobbying from the Australian government.

The reef is the world’s largest coral reef. Like many of these reefs the world over, it is in imminent danger from the effects of climate change. Other kinds of water pollution (plastic etc.) and human over-use may also be factors in the die-off of the coral.

However, the Australian government was concerned that officially designating it as “in danger” would result in a decline in tourism, especially for snorkelling.

__________________________________________

Source:

Readfearn, Graham. “World Heritage Committee Agrees not to Place Great Barrier Reef on ‘In Danger’ List.” The Guardian, July 23, 2021.